Tej Thakor Broker of Record / Owner 647-684-1731
Back to blog
Buyers

Latent vs Patent Defects in Ontario: What Buyers and Sellers Must Disclose

By Tej Thakor 9 min read
Latent vs Patent Defects in Ontario: What Buyers and Sellers Must Disclose

Ontario real estate runs on two legal concepts most buyers and sellers have never heard until something goes wrong: latent defects and patent defects. The difference between them decides whether you can sue a seller for $40,000 in mold remediation discovered six months after closing, or whether the law deems you should have spotted the problem yourself. This guide explains both concepts in plain English, what Ontario sellers are legally required to disclose, the landmark case law every realtor cites, and the practical steps that protect both buyers and sellers from disputes after closing.

What is the difference between latent and patent defects?

A patent defect is a property issue visible to the naked eye during an ordinary inspection — cracked drywall, broken windows, missing shingles, warped flooring. A latent defect is hidden — buried behind walls, under floors, inside systems, or only triggered by specific conditions (heavy rain, freezing temperatures). The legal difference matters because Ontario’s disclosure rules treat them very differently.

Patent defect Latent defect
Visible during inspection Yes No
Seller disclosure required No Yes, if material and known
Buyer can sue after closing No (caveat emptor) Yes, if 4-part test met
Examples Cracked tiles, peeling paint, broken fixtures Mold inside walls, faulty wiring, leaking foundation
Typical cost to remediate $200 – $5,000 $10,000 – $80,000+

What is a patent defect?

A patent defect is anything a reasonable person — or a qualified home inspector — would notice during a standard viewing. Common examples in GTA homes:

For patent defects, Ontario law applies the doctrine of caveat emptor (“buyer beware”). The seller has no obligation to point them out. If you toured the property, hired an inspector, and still missed the obvious — you bought the property with those defects and have no legal recourse. The price you paid was assumed to reflect what was visible.

What is a latent defect?

A latent defect is hidden — it cannot be discovered through ordinary inspection. Common examples:

These can cost $10,000 to $80,000+ to remediate. Discovering mold behind a basement wall three months after closing can mean tearing out drywall, treating the cause, replacing damaged framing, and re-finishing — often $25,000 minimum. That’s why Ontario law imposes a duty on sellers to disclose latent defects they know about, when those defects meet a specific legal test.

What must Ontario sellers disclose about a property?

Ontario sellers are not required to disclose every defect they know about. The law sets a higher bar. A seller must disclose a latent defect when all of the following are true:

  1. The seller knows about the defect (or recklessly disregarded it)
  2. The defect is not discoverable by a reasonable inspection
  3. The defect materially affects the property’s value or safety
  4. The defect renders the home dangerous or potentially uninhabitable — OR the seller takes active steps to conceal it

The leading Ontario authority is McGrath v. MacLean (1979, Ontario Court of Appeal), which established that a seller who knowingly conceals a latent defect that makes the property dangerous or uninhabitable can be sued for damages even after closing.

Later cases like Sevidal v. Chopra (1987) expanded the doctrine — a seller knew about radioactive soil contamination, failed to disclose, and was held liable. Krawchuk v. Scherbak (2011 ONCA) extended the duty to real estate agents who knew or should have known about material defects.

What sellers should disclose if known — even if not strictly required:

Disclosing voluntarily protects sellers from post-closing lawsuits. Non-disclosure that’s later discovered can be devastating — a buyer who proves all four elements of McGrath can recover full damages plus legal costs.

Not every hidden problem creates a lawsuit. To recover damages after closing, an Ontario buyer must prove all four elements:

Element What buyer must show
1. Knowledge The seller actually knew about the defect (or had constructive knowledge)
2. Concealment or non-disclosure The seller either actively concealed it (paint over mold) or failed to disclose it
3. Latency A reasonable buyer and qualified inspector could not have discovered it
4. Materiality The defect renders the property dangerous, uninhabitable, or significantly diminishes value

The hardest element to prove is usually #1 (knowledge). Buyers often rely on circumstantial evidence — repair invoices, neighbour testimony, prior insurance claims — to show the seller must have known.

What is the Seller Property Information Statement (SPIS)?

The Seller Property Information Statement (SPIS) — OREA Form 220 — is a voluntary disclosure form Ontario sellers can complete that lists known issues with the property. It covers everything from water damage and structural problems to past insurance claims and zoning issues.

The SPIS is not legally required in Ontario. However:

Whether to complete a SPIS is a strategic decision sellers should make with their lawyer and realtor. In my experience, a thorough and honest SPIS often shortens negotiations and reduces post-closing disputes — but only when the seller genuinely has clean information to share.

Caveat emptor: what does “buyer beware” actually cover?

Caveat emptor is the default position in Ontario residential real estate. It means buyers are responsible for inspecting and assessing the condition of any property they purchase. The seller is generally not obligated to volunteer information about visible problems.

Caveat emptor does apply to:

Caveat emptor does NOT apply when:

What if you discover a defect AFTER closing?

Steps to take if a serious defect surfaces after you’ve taken possession:

  1. Document everything immediately. Photos, videos, dates, witnesses. Get a professional assessment from a qualified engineer, mold remediator, electrician, or building inspector.
  2. Don’t make repairs yet. Preserve evidence of the original condition. Repairs done before legal action weaken your case.
  3. Contact your real estate lawyer. They’ll review whether the 4-part test is met and recommend whether to pursue the seller.
  4. Check title insurance. Some title insurance policies cover specific latent defects like septic system failures or unrecorded easements — but most physical defects (mold, foundation, wiring) are not covered.
  5. Investigate the seller’s knowledge. Subpoena repair records, insurance claims, contractor invoices. Knowledge is usually the hardest element to prove without paper trails.
  6. Watch the limitation period. Under Ontario’s Limitations Act, 2002, you generally have 2 years from discovering the defect to commence a lawsuit. Miss this and your claim is barred forever.

Does title insurance cover hidden defects?

Title insurance is often misunderstood. It covers title issues (ownership, encroachments, zoning violations, unrecorded liens, fraud) — not physical condition issues like mold or wiring. However, certain enhanced title insurance policies in Ontario now include limited coverage for specific defects:

What title insurance does not typically cover:

For physical defects, your remedies are limited to the seller (if disclosure rules were breached), the home inspector (if they negligently missed something visible), or your own insurance.

Practical advice for buyers

Practical advice for sellers

The bottom line

The latent vs patent defect distinction is one of the most consequential — and least understood — areas of Ontario real estate law. Buyers who don’t grasp it skip critical inspections and have no recourse later. Sellers who don’t grasp it expose themselves to lawsuits that can hit years after closing.

The protection on both sides is the same: thorough inspections, honest disclosure where required, careful documentation, and an experienced realtor and lawyer guiding the transaction. In 12+ years of GTA practice, the deals that go smoothly are the ones where everyone treats the defect-disclosure framework with respect from day one.

Buying or selling in the Greater Toronto Area and want to be sure your transaction is properly protected from disclosure pitfalls? I’d love to walk you through your specific property and situation. Schedule a free 15-minute call: Contact Tej Thakor, or text +1 (647) 684-1731 on WhatsApp.

Related reading: Title Search in Ontario + the OREA Requisition Date Explained · Status Certificate Ontario: Condo Buyer + Seller Guide · Top 10 Real Estate Mistakes Ontario Buyers + Sellers Make · What Is a Good Credit Score in Canada?

This article is for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. For advice on your specific transaction or dispute, consult a licensed Ontario real estate lawyer.

Frequently asked questions

Answers to the most common questions on this topic.

What is the difference between latent and patent defects in Ontario?

A patent defect is a property issue visible to the naked eye during an ordinary inspection — cracked drywall, broken windows, missing shingles, worn flooring. A latent defect is hidden — buried behind walls or under floors and not discoverable by a reasonable inspection — like mold inside walls, faulty wiring, or foundation problems behind finished basements. Ontario law treats them very differently: caveat emptor applies to patent defects, while sellers must disclose known latent defects that make the property unsafe or uninhabitable.

What must Ontario sellers disclose about a property?

Ontario sellers must disclose latent defects they know about when those defects materially affect the property's value or safety and render the home dangerous or potentially uninhabitable. Sellers are NOT required to disclose every defect — patent (visible) defects fall under caveat emptor (buyer beware). Many GTA sellers also voluntarily disclose past water damage, mold remediation, knob-and-tube wiring, asbestos, oil tanks, and prior insurance claims to reduce post-closing liability.

What is the Seller Property Information Statement (SPIS) in Ontario?

The SPIS (OREA Form 220) is a voluntary disclosure form Ontario sellers can complete to document known issues with the property — water damage, structural problems, insurance claims, zoning issues, and more. It's NOT legally required. However, sellers who complete it are legally accountable for the accuracy of their answers, and false statements create liability for fraudulent misrepresentation. Whether to complete a SPIS is a strategic decision sellers should make with their lawyer and realtor.

Can I sue a seller for hidden defects after closing in Ontario?

Yes — but only if you can prove all four elements of the McGrath v. MacLean test: (1) the seller actually knew about the defect, (2) the seller concealed it or failed to disclose, (3) the defect was not discoverable by reasonable inspection, and (4) the defect renders the property dangerous, uninhabitable, or significantly diminishes value. Under Ontario's Limitations Act, 2002, you have 2 years from discovering the defect to commence a lawsuit.

Does a home inspection catch latent defects?

Standard home inspections catch patent defects and many easier-to-detect latent issues like visible moisture, electrical panel problems, and HVAC age. However, hidden defects — mold inside walls, foundation issues behind finished basements, asbestos in insulation, faulty wiring concealed behind drywall — typically require specialty inspections ($200-$600 each) like mold testing, thermal imaging, sewer scope, oil tank scan, or asbestos sampling. A standard inspection ($450-$750) is essential but not exhaustive.

Does title insurance cover hidden defects in a home?

Generally no — title insurance covers ownership and title-related issues (encroachments, zoning violations, unrecorded liens, identity fraud) but not physical condition defects. Some enhanced Ontario title insurance policies include limited coverage for septic system failures, forced removal of unpermitted structures, and certain zoning violations. Mold, asbestos, faulty wiring, foundation issues, and HVAC problems are almost never covered — your remedies are limited to the seller or your home inspector.

What's an example of a latent defect that must be disclosed in Ontario?

Examples that meet Ontario's disclosure threshold (known to seller, hidden, material, dangerous/uninhabitable): active mold growth behind drywall causing health issues, a foundation crack hidden behind finished basement walls causing structural concern, an underground oil tank that has leaked, knob-and-tube wiring creating fire hazard, sewage backflow issues, vermiculite insulation containing asbestos, or carbon monoxide leakage from a defective furnace. If the seller knows and conceals, McGrath v. MacLean applies.

How long do I have to sue for a latent defect in Ontario?

Under Ontario's Limitations Act, 2002, you generally have 2 years from the date you discovered (or reasonably ought to have discovered) the latent defect to commence a lawsuit. The clock starts on discovery, not the closing date. There's also a 15-year absolute limit (ultimate limitation period) from the act or omission that caused the defect. Document everything and contact a real estate lawyer immediately if you suspect a major hidden defect.

Last reviewed: by Tej Thakor

Share
Call Tej Now 647-684-1731 · Available Mon–Sat